Irish Environmentalists Protest Shell’s Corrib Gas Pipeline
B. McPherson - Green Watch
Around the world, the ordinary people are starting to realize the huge potential for environmental damage that our addiction to fossil fuels has created. A group in Ireland under the banner of Shell to Sea
is using peaceful civil disobedience to protest the Royal Dutch Shell natural gas pipeline route.
They have three stated aims in this regard: to ensure the safety of the people and environment, to renegotiate the terms of royalties for the offshore gas deposits, and to address what they claim are human rights abuses.
The protesters have been interfering in the movement of materials used to build the pipeline. Two of the latest actions involved occupying a quarry that was supplying stone for the project and a woman locked herself to a tree cutting piece of machinery in an attempt to prevent cutting through a local forest.
“Protests last Thursday led to a stand-off at a local quarry where the owner ultimately used a high-powered water hose in an attempt to remove protestors from his machinery.
Earlier in the week, on Tuesday last, a garda used an angle-grinder to remove a woman who was locked by her neck to the arm of a tree-cutting machine.” Shell to Sea
Because the Corrib gas pipeline would snake through residential areas to the refinery, concern was expressed about the conflagration that would result from a high pressure rupture of the pipes. It was estimated at local hearings that dwellings within 700 feet of the line would burst into flames, allowing the inhabitants about 30 seconds to flee. While the consultants speaking for the oil consortium downplayed the danger, those in opposition to the route had a different take on the situation.
“Last week Desmond Branigan, of DB Marine Research and Associates, told the hearing that Lloyd’s Marine Intelligence Unit had recorded 1,200 deaths in the past decade (to 2008) as a result of pipeline fractures in 58 countries.” Shell to Sea
Oil and gas pipelines move millions of barrels of oil around the world. More are being proposed as you read this. While the pipeline builders seek to maintain high safety standards, accidents do happen. Sometimes spills occur when maintenance allows corrosion to eat its way through the pipe, other spills occur when transferring oil to ships or storage facilities. Human error is always a factor. The result of spills, leaks and flare offs is damage to the environment and often to people. Ordinary people are starting to say, “No!” to unbridled building of petroleum pipelines through sensitive environments.
A Few Proposed and Recently Built Petroleum Pipelines
·Corrib pipeline Ireland, County Mayo
·Keystone pipeline, Canada to US Gulf coast
·Northern Gateway pipeline, Alberta Canada to BC Canada coast
·Kinder Morgan Trans Mountain pipeline, Alberta Canada to BC Canada coast
·Abu Dhabi Crude Oil Pipeline, to bypass the Strait of Hormuz
·Maze of proposed pipelines to move Russian oil to Europe, map link
Sir, – Minister for Energy and Natural Resources Pat Rabbitte’s response to Fintan O’Toole’s article (August 16th) on our offshore licensing terms and his intention to issue new licences under the current licensing terms is disingenuous in the extreme (Opinion, August 18th).
But perhaps big oil’s biggest success was diminishing the political will to implement appropriate regulation. Even after the international community adopted the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) in 1992, the fossil-fuel industry managed to block meaningful progress — to the point that, if serious action is not taken soon, the entire process could unravel.
In Europe, Royal Dutch Shell’s lobbying so diluted the EU’s efforts that there are now no binding targets for renewables or energy efficiency for individual countries. The company even sent a letter to the European Commission’s president claiming that “gas is good for Europe.” Shell and other oil companies are now promising to work as “advisers” to national governments on how to deal with climate change.